DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
DeepSeek
Z.ai
Released
Oct 17, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.31M (best)
Max output
944K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10$0.10–$0.30 across 4
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.29$0.29–$1.20 across 4
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
4
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
32.5 (best)
27.8
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 27.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis