LogoFastRouter

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomixiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Creator
DeepSeek
Xiaomi
Released
Oct 17, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10$0.10–$0.30 across 4 (best)
$0.14
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.29$0.29–$1.20 across 4
$0.28 (best)
Providers
4 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
32.6 (best)
26.7
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiMo V2.6 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash, from Xiaomi, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens and scores 26.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis