DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
Gemini 4 ArgonGooglegoogle/gemini-4-argon
Creator
DeepSeek
Google
Released
Oct 17, 2026
Oct 13, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10$0.10–$0.30 across 4 (best)
$2.00
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.29$0.29–$1.20 across 4 (best)
$10.00
Providers
4 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
32.5
50.4 (best)
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
No
No

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 4 Argon are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 4 Argon, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.00/1M input and $10.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 50.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the cheapest on input, 20× cheaper than the next model and Gemini 4 Argon scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-4-argon", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis