Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-sonnet-5
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
Anthropic
Z.ai
Released
Jul 1, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.00
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5 (best)
Providers
2
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
38.2
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
71.5
74.8 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.4s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3: summary

Claude Sonnet 5 and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Sonnet 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $2.00/1M input and $10.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 38.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3 is the cheapest on input, 3.6× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3 has the largest context window, GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence and GLM-5.3 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis