Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
Creator
Anthropic
Google
Released
Jul 24, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00
$0.75 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00
$3.75 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
48.1 (best)
40.9
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.5 (best)
76.3
LatencyMedian time to first token
30s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: summary

Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 48.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 40.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the cheapest on input, 6.7× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 3.8 Flash has the largest context window, Claude Opus 5 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Opus 5 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis