Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-4.8
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
Anthropic
Z.ai
Released
May 27, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5 (best)
Providers
3
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
41.8
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
74.3
74.8 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
19s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.3: summary

Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 4.8, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3 is the cheapest on input, 8.9× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3 has the largest context window, GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence and GLM-5.3 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.8", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis