Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.7

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-4.8
Grok 4.7xAIx-ai/grok-4.7
Creator
Anthropic
xAI
Released
May 27, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
1M (best)
500K
Max output
128K
500K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00
$2.00 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00
$6.00 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
41.8
46.3 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
74.3
—
LatencyMedian time to first token
19s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.7: summary

Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.7 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 4.8, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.7, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 46.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.7 is the cheapest on input, 2.5× cheaper than the next model, Claude Opus 4.8 has the largest context window and Grok 4.7 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.8", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.7", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis