Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-4.7
GPT-5.5OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.5
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Apr 16, 2026
Apr 24, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00 (best)
$5.50
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00 (best)
$33.00
Providers
3 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
40.7 (best)
38.4
CodingArtificial Analysis index
73.6
74.9 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.5s (best)
6.1s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s (best)
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5: summary

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 4.7, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 40.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.5, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $5.50/1M input and $33.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 38.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Opus 4.7 is the cheapest on input, 1.1× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.5 has the largest context window, Claude Opus 4.7 scores highest for intelligence, GPT-5.5 leads on coding and Claude Opus 4.7 has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.7", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.5", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis