Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Muse Spark 1.2Metameta/muse-spark-1.2
Creator
Anthropic
Meta
Released
Apr 16, 2026
Aug 22, 2025
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00
$1.25 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00
$4.25 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
40.7 (best)
39.6
CodingArtificial Analysis index
73.6 (best)
72.2
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.5s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.2: summary

Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.2 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 4.7, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 40.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Muse Spark 1.2, from Meta, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $1.25/1M input and $4.25/1M output tokens and scores 39.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Muse Spark 1.2 is the cheapest on input, 4× cheaper than the next model, Muse Spark 1.2 has the largest context window, Claude Opus 4.7 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.7", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="meta/muse-spark-1.2", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis