Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomixiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Creator
Anthropic
Xiaomi
Released
Oct 7, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10 (best)
$0.14
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.50
$0.28 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
34.6 (best)
26.7
Accepts
Image, Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: summary

Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Haiku 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 34.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash, from Xiaomi, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens and scores 26.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model, MiMo V2.6 Flash has the largest context window and Claude Haiku 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis