Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.
Estimate monthly cost for these modelsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: summary
Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.
Claude Haiku 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 34.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the largest context window and Claude Haiku 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.
Switch with one line
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6 Astra
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis