Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5
Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.7-flash
Creator
Anthropic
Google
Released
Jun 9, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.75 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$3.75 (best)
Providers
1
2 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
49.6 (best)
39.1
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.5 (best)
76.1
LatencyMedian time to first token
14s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: summary

Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 49.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.7 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the cheapest on input, 13× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 3.7 Flash has the largest context window, Claude Fable 5 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Fable 5 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.7-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis