Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Creator
Anthropic
Anthropic
Released
Jun 9, 2026
Apr 16, 2026
Context window
1M
1M
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$5.00 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$25.00 (best)
Providers
1
3 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
49.6 (best)
40.7
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.5 (best)
73.6
LatencyMedian time to first token
14s
4.5s (best)
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s (best)
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7: summary

Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.7 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 49.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Opus 4.7, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 40.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Opus 4.7 is the cheapest on input, 2× cheaper than the next model, Claude Fable 5 scores highest for intelligence, Claude Fable 5 leads on coding and Claude Fable 5 has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.7", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis